--- layout: post status: publish published: true title: Two examples of egregious Libya ’spin’ author: display_name: David Brake login: David Brake email: david-brake@blog.org url: http://blog.org author_login: David Brake author_email: david-brake@blog.org author_url: http://blog.org excerpt: 'The pictures that have been circulating for several months of the DIY weapons put together by Libyan rebels tell a great story about the plucky underdog but when I read “@tim_libert: these are the DIY weapons that won Libyan civil war, courtesy of The Atlantic” I was a little stunned. As he noted himself a [...]' wordpress_id: 3685 wordpress_url: http://blog.org/?p=1826 date: '2011-08-22 12:42:07 +0000' date_gmt: '2011-08-22 10:42:07 +0000' categories: - PlanetPOuL tags: [] comments: [] ---
The pictures that have been circulating for several months of the DIY weapons put together by Libyan rebels tell a great story about the plucky underdog but when I read “@tim_libert: these are the DIY weapons that won Libyan civil war, courtesy of The Atlantic” I was a little stunned. As he noted himself a few minutes later, “Libya also had a LOT of western air support”. Indeed. And it is worth noting that that air support is still presented, officially at least, as being merely “enforcing a UN resolution to protect civilians“. Surely after 7,400 sorties that’s a rather inadequate figleaf for NATO action by now?
This is not to say that I have any way of judging how things really played out in Libya, that the Libyan rebels were not valiant fighters or that NATO is unjustified in intervening as it did – it’s just an observation that as with any war press coverage is inevitably subject to spin.