--- layout: post status: publish published: true title: What would you like to see most in minix? author: display_name: axj login: axj email: axj@www.fsugitalia.org url: http://www.fsugitalia.org/wp author_login: axj author_email: axj@www.fsugitalia.org author_url: http://www.fsugitalia.org/wp excerpt: Hello everybody out there using minix - I’m doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won’t be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I’d like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat [...] wordpress_id: 2567 wordpress_url: http://www.fsugitalia.org/wp/?p=1181 date: '2011-08-26 00:27:16 +0000' date_gmt: '2011-08-25 22:27:16 +0000' categories: - PlanetPOuL tags: [] comments: [] ---
Hello everybody out there using minix -
I’m doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won’t be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I’d like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).I’ve currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
This implies that I’ll get something practical within a few months, and
I’d like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions
are welcome, but I won’t promise I’ll implement them![]()
Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi)
PS. Yes – it’s free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs.
It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that’s all I have.
Alla faccia di chi diceva che sarebbe stato un fuoco di paglia senza futuro. Grazie di tutto.